Difference between revisions of "Talk:Damage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I actually like the new way he's doing it. Looks less cluttered to me. :/ | ::I actually like the new way he's doing it. Looks less cluttered to me. :/ | ||
::-- [[User:DevliN|DevliN]] 18:45, 23 November 2010 (PST) | ::-- [[User:DevliN|DevliN]] 18:45, 23 November 2010 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The issue I had with the table was that it was cluttered and took up a whole bunch of space. If there were a way to collapse it or something I wouldn't mind creating one that had a brief description of each field (a sentence or two at most) and a link to the appropriate page, where you'd go to look up more in-depth info. EDIT: Ninja'd by devlin. --[[User:Wangbot|Wangbot]] 18:48, 23 November 2010 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 24 November 2010
Created and wrote some basic stuff. Not happy with how the documentation on the fields is laid out right now, but I just went with it for now. Any suggestions? --Wangbot 21:04, 22 November 2010 (PST)
- Looks alright to me, can't think of any other way to do it. --Jack 21:23, 22 November 2010 (PST)
Table or not?
- I personally prefered the version of this wiki when it had a table with columns for like "Name" and "Description". What about mixing both methods? The Table would include a "Reference" column which would link to all those related wikis you've created aside from this one.
- -- Payne 18:39, 23 November 2010 (PST)
- I actually like the new way he's doing it. Looks less cluttered to me. :/
- -- DevliN 18:45, 23 November 2010 (PST)
- The issue I had with the table was that it was cluttered and took up a whole bunch of space. If there were a way to collapse it or something I wouldn't mind creating one that had a brief description of each field (a sentence or two at most) and a link to the appropriate page, where you'd go to look up more in-depth info. EDIT: Ninja'd by devlin. --Wangbot 18:48, 23 November 2010 (PST)