Difference between revisions of "User:Wangbot"

From HIVE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:I believe he's from SC2mod.com --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 19:28, 22 November 2010 (PST)
 
:I believe he's from SC2mod.com --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 19:28, 22 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
:Yep, I am :) I'm pretty familiar with the editor, and I'll probably be updating pages on data editor stuff (units, behaviors, effects, validators, that kinda stuff). I also know Andromeda and general programming pretty well, so if you guys need an extra hand with that feel free to ask. (I'm an undergraduate at university, bio/computer science...if you were wondering) --[[User:Wangbot|Wangbot]] 20:45, 22 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
::Man, your wiki on Damage is just... epic! You rock! XD
 +
::I'm pretty glad to see such a collaboration between map-making communities. :) -- [[User:Payne|Payne]] 20:58, 22 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
==Damage Effect==
 +
Seeing how big your work is on this Effect, and seeing the number of "sub-articles" you've created to fully define the Damage Effect, I though it could be useful to only classify them under the "Documentation" category, thus removing them from all the other categories (except maybe StarCraft II?). I feel like it has to be done in order to keep the "Data Editor" and "Reference" categories "clean".
 +
 +
This is only my personal feel of the situation and I'd like to hear from the rest of the community.
 +
 +
P.S. If you are to set them in the Documentation category, I believe you are the perfect one to write the "documentation format" for the Data Editor: http://www.galaxywiki.net/index.php?title=Documentation_Format
 +
 +
-- [[User:Payne|Payne]] 15:11, 30 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
:I just moved all the sub-articles into the doc category earlier today. I have no issues with removing the other tags. So either I or anyone else can go through them and do that if there's no objections.
 +
 +
:I was also going to write something up on the documentation format talk page on a standard for data editor documentation later (maybe today, if not definitely by tomorrow). I have some ideas but I want to get some community feedback before officially putting it on the page. --[[User:Wangbot|Wangbot]] 15:27, 30 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
::I personally feel like the way you've done it so far is flawless. And it'd be so sad to make you go back through all of your articles to modify them so they fit a new canvas. XD
 +
::Anyways, let me remember people that'll come discuss in here that the subject is "'''Should all those (CEffectDamage)wikis be only listed in the Documentation category?'''".
 +
::-- [[User:Payne|Payne]] 15:41, 30 November 2010 (PST)
 +
 +
Jack has been asking where I've been in the past few months. Sorry for disappearing on you guys, but I had to take a break from things to study for finals and the past semester I've been really busy working in a research lab. I have finals coming up again soon as well as moving into a new apartment and the MCATs in May, so needless to say I'll be really busy in the coming weeks. I might be back over the summer though to do some more work here. --[[User:Wangbot|Wangbot]] 13:48, 25 April 2011 (PDT)
 +
 +
:alright, sounds good :D --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 14:00, 25 April 2011 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 21:00, 25 April 2011

Hi, mind presenting yourself? You look like a nice person.. and you're making pretty nice updates. :>

-- Payne 20:09, 21 November 2010 (PST)

I believe he's from SC2mod.com --Jack 19:28, 22 November 2010 (PST)
Yep, I am :) I'm pretty familiar with the editor, and I'll probably be updating pages on data editor stuff (units, behaviors, effects, validators, that kinda stuff). I also know Andromeda and general programming pretty well, so if you guys need an extra hand with that feel free to ask. (I'm an undergraduate at university, bio/computer science...if you were wondering) --Wangbot 20:45, 22 November 2010 (PST)
Man, your wiki on Damage is just... epic! You rock! XD
I'm pretty glad to see such a collaboration between map-making communities. :) -- Payne 20:58, 22 November 2010 (PST)

Damage Effect

Seeing how big your work is on this Effect, and seeing the number of "sub-articles" you've created to fully define the Damage Effect, I though it could be useful to only classify them under the "Documentation" category, thus removing them from all the other categories (except maybe StarCraft II?). I feel like it has to be done in order to keep the "Data Editor" and "Reference" categories "clean".

This is only my personal feel of the situation and I'd like to hear from the rest of the community.

P.S. If you are to set them in the Documentation category, I believe you are the perfect one to write the "documentation format" for the Data Editor: http://www.galaxywiki.net/index.php?title=Documentation_Format

-- Payne 15:11, 30 November 2010 (PST)

I just moved all the sub-articles into the doc category earlier today. I have no issues with removing the other tags. So either I or anyone else can go through them and do that if there's no objections.
I was also going to write something up on the documentation format talk page on a standard for data editor documentation later (maybe today, if not definitely by tomorrow). I have some ideas but I want to get some community feedback before officially putting it on the page. --Wangbot 15:27, 30 November 2010 (PST)
I personally feel like the way you've done it so far is flawless. And it'd be so sad to make you go back through all of your articles to modify them so they fit a new canvas. XD
Anyways, let me remember people that'll come discuss in here that the subject is "Should all those (CEffectDamage)wikis be only listed in the Documentation category?".
-- Payne 15:41, 30 November 2010 (PST)

Jack has been asking where I've been in the past few months. Sorry for disappearing on you guys, but I had to take a break from things to study for finals and the past semester I've been really busy working in a research lab. I have finals coming up again soon as well as moving into a new apartment and the MCATs in May, so needless to say I'll be really busy in the coming weeks. I might be back over the summer though to do some more work here. --Wangbot 13:48, 25 April 2011 (PDT)

alright, sounds good :D --Jack 14:00, 25 April 2011 (PDT)